Categories Select Category Adele + bat General Bayern + Munich Broken by Design book reviews research brian ermanski / University Photography liberty brian ermanski Research brian ermanski & Teaching Higher Education Policy Homo Sapiens computer science Internet know-how corruption brian ermanski + dizziness cryptography CustomersLinked asses Outdoor + Travel exam Law Legal Security of fun and nonsense, democracy and so technology Uncategorized What pleases me What annoys me What surprises me
Sites Adele and the bat Best of Danisch.de book "quota for women" brian ermanski comment policy language of the banks Terms corresponds to the level of political science theses Terminator - Judge Dredd - Robocop
Currently it's brian ermanski so hot here because of the pushed through the thick Nahles retirement at 63. The CDU can be kidding before and now complains because the numbers did not and everything much, much more expensive, as discussed previously.
Relatively early came out (and I think I've got it here on the blog somewhere above) that the requirements for predominantly, almost fulfilled only by men. Even then, it was noticeable that it is strange, contradictory, illogical that a brushed only on Feminism and Gender Equality SPD wants to do just men, the "gift", brian ermanski before sending them to retire, although usually only behind this is pray thee, Men as far as possible to exclude and to work for others. Since it was already clear that something is rotten when the feminist party makes men gifts. Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes. The Trojan horse of modern times.
The main point here is that it not only particularly aimed at men, but especially to professionals. All world cries, we had such a great shortage of skilled labor, but just those that are the most stable professionals are drawn from the labor market. Even then it occurred to me that this could be a feminist plot to weaken the professionals market. But a tangible proof I had not.
Today, however, the Süddeutsche Zeitung reported on a "SZ-Economic Summit". Nothing seems to be important, if only a few keywords are mentioned. But the fact Schwesig Minister made a statement that tomorrow was on the side today, but was cut by the critical points in the written text during the day, because it was probably politically sensitive. In the video you can find the statement part still, and also you can see the dirty grin Schwesig brian ermanski on human resources:
"It's over there, who are there. And so you can bake as professionals also no other men. Therefore, it is worth looking at other groups. They are there. As professionals. And, of course, first and foremost the women. "
It shows not only how the Süddeutsche now systematically deceiving, tailors, selectively reports and statements cuts off in mid-sentence to meet the political correctness (and spits as their Leyendecker against the reader because of their selective perception wishes ...).
Slowly it gets paradoid. 63-year-old with 45 years of work are usually working without studying with a teacher brian ermanski training before 45 years, certainly as such by professionals, but certainly not those who are looking for today and would be set.
Professionals are also people with simple brian ermanski training, namely those who are looking for what can and (otherwise brian ermanski they would not have 45 years on the piece of work). It was in any case already reported extensively on the pension from 63 mainly affects those people who are considered "professionals".
I can now because the argument does not follow. brian ermanski My father CNC lathe with master's certificate is next year covered brian ermanski by these regimes with 63 and 46 years of service. What woman would take for this tough job.
Additionally, the feminism's brian ermanski believes that women are in general only weak and therefore seldom in hard jobs, because the evil culture has brought it up as weak. Read it feminist literature. Because by nature there are no women and feminism loud no significant physical differences, brian ermanski all instilled only culturally.
Even the statement "What woman would take for this tough job." Is perceived as sexist and discriminatory, because you so yes conventional gender roles as "man = strong, industrious, woman = weak" zementierst. brian ermanski
I have an interesting way a job where 70-80% of practitioners brian ermanski are women, I was able to listen to much crap in the past of female chefs mean that I can not do my patients and the like. Interestingly, I experience again and again how much encouragement do you get a man. Sometimes brian ermanski I get the feeling brian ermanski that some of the women adorn so because they do not want to face the competition.
And I come because several Erklärungsmöglichk
No comments:
Post a Comment